fbpx
Politics Foreign Affairs Culture Fellows Program

It Ain’t Penthouse Forum, But It’s Still Creepy

A friend who is a former letters editor at a daily newspaper sends along this delicious controversy over the possibility that the husband of Paula Broadwell, who was shtupping being shtupped by David Petraeus, outed their affair in a letter to the New York Times’ Ethicist columnist.  Here’s the letter, and columnist Chuck Klosterman’s astute answer: MY […]

A friend who is a former letters editor at a daily newspaper sends along this delicious controversy over the possibility that the husband of Paula Broadwell, who was shtupping being shtupped by David Petraeus, outed their affair in a letter to the New York Times’ Ethicist columnist.  Here’s the letter, and columnist Chuck Klosterman’s astute answer:

MY WIFE’S LOVER

My wife is having an affair with a government executive. His role is to manage a project whose progress is seen worldwide as a demonstration of American leadership. (This might seem hyperbolic, but it is not an exaggeration.) I have met with him on several occasions, and he has been gracious. (I doubt if he is aware of my knowledge.) I have watched the affair intensify over the last year, and I have also benefited from his generosity. He is engaged in work that I am passionate about and is absolutely the right person for the job. I strongly feel that exposing the affair will create a major distraction that would adversely impact the success of an important effort. My issue: Should I acknowledge this affair and finally force closure? Should I suffer in silence for the next year or two for a project I feel must succeed? Should I be “true to my heart” and walk away from the entire miserable situation and put the episode behind me? NAME WITHHELD

Don’t expose the affair in any high-profile way. It would be different if this man’s project was promoting some (contextually hypocritical) family-values platform, but that doesn’t appear to be the case. The only motive for exposing the relationship would be to humiliate him and your wife, and that’s never a good reason for doing anything. This is between you and your spouse. You should tell her you want to separate, just as you would if she were sleeping with the mailman. The idea of “suffering in silence” for the good of the project is illogical. How would the quiet divorce of this man’s mistress hurt an international leadership initiative? He’d probably be relieved.

The fact that you’re willing to accept your wife’s infidelity for some greater political good is beyond honorable. In fact, it’s so over-the-top honorable that I’m not sure I believe your motives are real. Part of me wonders why you’re even posing this question, particularly in a column that is printed in The New York Times.

Your dilemma is intriguing, but I don’t see how it’s ambiguous. Your wife is having an affair with a person you happen to respect. Why would that last detail change the way you respond to her cheating? Do you admire this man so much that you haven’t asked your wife why she keeps having sex with him? I halfway suspect you’re writing this letter because you want specific people to read this column and deduce who is involved and what’s really going on behind closed doors (without actually addressing the conflict in person). That’s not ethical, either.

“Name Withheld” suggests that the man signed his name. Assuming that the Times verified the ID of the letter-writer, as they do for letters to the editor (the nature of the Ethicist column may not require them to do so), then they know his name. This is not the last we’ve heard of this letter, I’m betting.

Advertisement

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Subscribe for as little as $5/mo to start commenting on Rod’s blog.

Join Now