- The American Conservative - http://www.theamericanconservative.com -

Garrison Keillor? Who He?

Garrison Keillor? Who he? [1] David Vossbrink writes:

Garrison Keillor has been disappeared into the Memory Hole. If you look for his biography or the archived shows from a half century of “A Prairie Home Companion” on the website of Minnesota Public Radio since his fall from grace, you’ll now find only this: “Sorry, but there’s no page here.”

Keillor and his entire body of work from “A Prairie Home Companion” and “Writer’s Almanac” have been effectively erased from the archives of MPR, along with the work of all the other storytellers, singers, poets and production staff who made the shows successful.

In these tumultuous days of unceasing revelations of sexual scandals in media, politics and business, media enterprises especially face a new ethical challenge with their fallen stars: What do you do with history and art?

That’s a very good question, though it really should be an easy one to answer: as a general rule, the art is separate from the artist. The MPR panic is what you would expect from a Stalinist regime dealing with figures who have fallen out of ideological failure. Unless MPR has evidence that Keillor was some kind of unspeakable monster, this response has been hysterical and unjust — unjust not just to those who worked on the show, including Keillor, but unjust to the show’s fans, and future fans.

MPR has given no details of its decision to unperson Keillor, other than it believes him guilty of sexual harassment. Keillor told his side of the story, to some extent, and if he’s right, there’s no way this is a proper response by MPR. Then again, he might be self-servingly manipulating the truth. We don’t know yet, and may never know.

Vossbrink continues:

As consumers of news, entertainment and art, we should be able to choose what we want to watch. If you’re uncomfortable with the work of sleazy movie stars, celebrities and producers, then you can ignore them. That shouldn’t be MPR’s call.

By the Memory Hole standard, we wouldn’t have much history or culture to choose from our collective pasts. Too many artists and politicians from other eras have been pigs, though their art and their decisions live on. We should be able learn from their histories.

We learn, too, from debates about confederate monuments and the whitewashing of history, and how we handle the paradoxes of Thomas Jefferson as a slave-holding champion of liberty, Christopher Columbus as a bold and brutal explorer, and Robert E. Lee as traitor and war hero.

If you only chose to partake of art, music, and literature created by morally upstanding persons, you’d quickly come to the end of what’s available. Museums would empty out. Concert halls would fall silent. Bookstores would have to be repurposed as yoga studios, and movie theaters as hipster churches. The unfortunate truth is that bad, or at least deeply flawed, people often make the best art.

Assuming the worst about Garrison Keillor’s private behavior does not negate the decades of pleasure — wholesome pleasure, let it be noted; my kids and I used to listen to his show together — that his quality radio program provided. If we grant MPR and content-owners like them the right to erase the artistic legacy of creators like Keillor, where does it stop? Who will be next?

Read the whole thing. [1] Oddly enough, what’s happened to Keillor makes me more opposed to removing Confederate statues — not because of any sympathy for the Confederacy (I have none), but because of fear of erasing historical memory. All totalitarian regimes know that the key to controlling a people is controlling its memory. We are, for now, a free people. One key to preserving our freedom is saving as much cultural memory we can from those who, whether out of nefarious motives or an overabundance of moral zeal, would prefer that we not know.

You can walk into any good bookstore in the country and buy the works of Louis-Ferdinand Céline and Ezra Pound, though both were pro-fascist during the Second World War. And you should be able to! To unperson someone whose artistic work is as gentle and anodyne as Garrison Keillor’s because of some alleged sins in his personal life ought to chill writers, musicians, artists, and those who love art, music and literature, to the bone. I’ve mentioned in this space on several occasions that I hear from readers who grew up in Communist countries, and who tell me that they sense more and more the same atmosphere of their youth coming into existence here. This erasing of Keillor and his enormous and valuable creative legacy from history has to be setting off their internal alarms.

106 Comments (Open | Close)

106 Comments To "Garrison Keillor? Who He?"

#1 Comment By BadReligion On December 9, 2017 @ 7:54 pm

“Seriously? Do you only patronize artists whose political views you happen to entirely agree with?
Someone can disagree with you and still be a great artist, you know.”

Of course that’s true, and no, I don’t have to entirely agree with them. There are some deal-breakers, however.

“If we could trust Antifa, generally, to be as nuanced in its evaluations of good and evil as BadReligion’s assessment of Nathan Bedford Forrest, I might send them a donation. I could write a similar list of pros and cons regarding Murray and Hernstein, and neither, to begin with, has demerits as deep as Forrest’s.”

Charles Murray is quite unrepentant about his propagation of the idea that biological “races” exist, and have different strengths and weaknesses that explain their relative well-being in society. He helped to give this toxic nonsense a veneer of respectability, and there is no nuance there.

#2 Comment By Charles Consaul On December 10, 2017 @ 3:55 pm

You have no objection to the side that lost the war acting like they won it? You have no empathy for the people who have to walk past those statues every day, feeling like losers when they won? How about the lack of respect whoever put those statues up had, for the individual(s) who didn’t want one in the first place? Personally, I question that kind of judgement!

#3 Comment By Rossbach On December 11, 2017 @ 10:53 am

“The MPR panic is what you would expect from a Stalinist regime dealing with figures who have fallen out of ideological failure.”

As I recall, Keillor was a dedicated Liberal Democrat and never hesitated to say so. It was he and his ideological brethren who created the monster that eventually destroyed him.

#4 Comment By Lori On December 11, 2017 @ 7:25 pm

I suppose it doesn’t matter that Mr Keillor owns the rights to APHC, so when they severed ties American Public Media and MPR *had* to remove the archived episodes from the website?
They also have to change the name of the show moving forward and stop doing certain skits that are Mr Keillor’s intellectual property.
As for the allegations against him, the only thing the president of APM will say is there were multiple allegations from numerous sources. There was a full investigation.
Why on earth would they fire their biggest and most beloved personality unless there was a legit reason?

#5 Comment By Gregg G Brown On December 12, 2017 @ 7:39 am

>>Stalinist regime dealing with figures who have fallen out of ideological failure.

You mean “fallen out of ideological FAVOR”. You can’t fall out of failure.

#6 Comment By Richard Lee On December 14, 2017 @ 2:08 am

You’ve eloquently voiced my worst fears, which I am shocked still to find are not shared by most people. Based on MPR’s so-called standardsI can think of few artists who should not be erased . And nary an artist nor a serious thinker has come forward to call the horrible obscenity committed by MPR and its overpaid overseers by name. Jon McTaggert’s shall live in infamy.