Print This Page

A Thousand Lives: The Untold Story of Hope, Deception, and Survival at Jonestown, Julia Scheeres, Free Press, 320 pages

By Daniel J. Flynn | November 17, 2011

Surreal doesn’t convey the fictional quality of hundreds of happy children obliviously awaiting their deaths watching “Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory” or their Kool-Aid executioner just two years earlier enjoying a private audience with the soon-to-be president’s wife. Jonestown retains this dreamlike state decades after it has decayed into the jungle. Rebecca Moore, Julia Scheeres, and other writers seek in the 21st century to raise the 20th-century dead. Could we have misunderstood the people of the Peoples Temple the way they misunderstood the god of the Peoples Temple?

Jim Jones killed more African Americans than the Ku Klux Klan. Julia Scheeres, in her new book, A Thousand Lives, juxtaposes the preacher with Rosa Parks and the students who held a lunch-counter sit-in at the Greensboro, North Carolina Woolworth’s. Jim Jones called blacks his equals. He let them join his church. He even adopted an African-American boy. Then he imprisoned, enslaved, and ultimately murdered hundreds of African-Americans at his Guyanese concentration camp. He started off with the best of intentions, the text leads readers to think.

Scheeres gleans the wrong lessons from Jonestown. But her conclusions do not stem from false premises. A Thousand Lives doesn’t contain a thousand errors. Chiding Jones for exaggerating when the truth about racism proved bad enough, she ironically one-ups the Pentecostal Marxist by pointing to “examples from real life,” such as the police killings in the late ’60s of 28 Black Panthers—a story thoroughly debunked more than 40 years ago in an exhaustive Edward Jay Epstein New Yorker piece—as a supposed truth the minister might have invoked. On the next page she mistakenly cites 1975 rather than 1977 as the year of Temple supporter Harvey Milk’s election to the San Francisco board of supervisors. But the book’s factual claims are otherwise fairly solid.

Take, for instance, the author’s rebuff of the temptation to label a Bible stomper a Bible thumper. In the foggy aftermath of the 1978 rain forest annihilation, some Americans chalked up the bizarre South American suicides as Christian fundamentalism run amok. This narrative, to the extent that it persists, can’t survive a reading of A Thousand Lives.

Long before the migration southward, the Peoples Temple instructed that “the Bible murders,” the author explains. Jones appropriated the words of the Bible to undermine the Bible in his most widely read tract: “The Letter Killeth, but the Spirit Giveth LIFE.” The assault on Christianity intensified following the establishment of the secluded colony. The Peoples Temple ceased hosting Sunday services in Guyana. They replaced Christmas Day with Revolution Day. Upon the death of a senior citizen, a Jones lieutenant informed camp dwellers that the old man had “made the mistake of calling out to Jesus from his deathbed instead of Jim Jones.” Father Jim, who had stomped on the Bible in San Francisco, banned it within Jonestown, a prohibition lifted only when the community ran out of toilet paper.

The initial characterization of events proved untenable. Christians, fundamentalist or otherwise, generally don’t confuse the Book of Books for Quilted Northern. The meme that dismissed the dead as religious fanatics has been replaced with a meme that sees them as enlightened progressives. “You won’t find the word cult in this book,” the author boasts. “The word cult only discourages intellectual curiosity and empathy.” Though nearly everything she describes screams “cult,” she absolves the political cultists from a pejorative worthy of Moonies or schismatic Seventh Day Adventists but not sophisticated San Francisco socialists.

The book-length rehabilitation of the disgraced church centers on the secular faith, rather than any supernatural one, of its congregants. A Thousand Lives labels Peoples Temple a “national church” for the “counterculture.” As its name suggested, Peoples Temple offered a social gospel minus the gospel. It traced roots to Karl Marx, not Jesus Christ. Jones’s “churches in San Francisco and Los Angeles were planted smack dab in the middle of the ghetto,” she writes, “where they became a mecca for the urban poor, offering free health care, child care, career counseling, drug rehabilitation, legal aid, and food. What wasn’t to like?”

Presumably, the part when a guy from Indiana declared himself God. That guy-God arranging and rearranging marriages, isolating temple members from family members, demanding total financial submission, performing phony faith healings, rehearsing dry runs of suicide, concocting paranoid tales of U.S. government persecution, and physically abusing church-goers in front of other church-goers should have sparked epiphanies. Instead, these acts further solidified Jones’s hold over his flock. They weeded out individuals and calcified the herd’s subservience. Scheeres acknowledges this. But she blames all on the raven-haired, drugged-out deity. Who can fault followers for following?

The ideological sympathies that suckered Jones’s flock exerted a powerful sway over Bay Area politicians who aided and abetted the death cult. So in with the in-crowd was Jones that San Francisco’s mayor appointed him chairman of the city’s housing authority, an ideal perch for one who made a living freeloading on the government checks of freeloaders. “Jones’s powerful friends helped him mitigate the damage,” Scheeres explains of an expose on Jones in the alternative press.

His old friend California Lieutenant Governor Mervyn Dymally wrote the Guyanese prime minister to reassure him that Jones was an upstanding citizen, and the men he helped elect—Mayor [George] Moscone, City Supervisor Harvey Milk, and District Attorney Joseph Freitas—rallied behind him as well, refusing to heed calls to investigate the Temple. Moscone told reporters that there was no proof of criminal activity, only allegations of wrongdoing.

A specific place and time, a 1970s Bay Area still high on the fumes of the 1960s, gave rise to Peoples Temple. It also helped the North American socialists that their South American hosts were socialists, too.

The residents of Jonestown weren’t the only ones to drink the Kool-Aid. Jonestown remains a cautionary tale about the power of ideologically-inspired delusions. “Had I walked by 1859 Geary Boulevard in San Francisco when Peoples Temple was in full swing,” the author frankly admits, “I certainly would have been drawn to the doorway.” She sets out to provide readers an understanding of why people might have joined the Peoples Temple by telling their stories. She succeeds in providing that understanding not so much through the stories themselves but through the fawning manner in which she tells them.

“Ultimately, the laudable aspects of Peoples Temple have been forgotten in the horrifying wake of Jonestown,” the author laments. If a credible, award-winning author writing 33 years after the fact could get seduced in dry archives, then one gleans how the poor, the elderly, the strays, and the strung out fell for the charismatic minister in real time.

The author conflates her politics with morality. That she sees some of her own principles at work in her subjects impairs judgment. She can’t come to grips with how people whose beliefs were so good could be so evil. So hardwired is that conceit that she asks her readers to reassess parents who murdered their children but can’t ask herself to reassess the philosophy that brought them to that point. Julia Scheeres is as much a captive of ideology as the people that she writes about. Political self-deception flatters the ego but obscures reality.

Such delusions cost more than 900 people their lives in South America. It merely costs the author a more complete understanding of her subjects. She marvels at the paradox of noble ideas unleashing ignoble deeds. But in the aftermath of the Lenin/Stalin/Hitler/Mao-century, socialism manifesting as horror show isn’t ironic. It’s clichéd.

Socialism is the submission of the individual to the wishes of the collective. This is what happened in Guyana on November 18, 1978. People who fervently believed in telling other people how to live their lives were told by other people to stop living theirs. Contra Scheeres, their coda was the culmination of their beliefs rather than a betrayal of them. Bequeathing their accumulated wealth to one of the 20th-century’s other great graveyard of socialists, the Soviet Union, further affirms this.

A Thousand Lives judges the Peoples Temple by its words rather than its deeds. It interprets the congregants’ belief in a dream not as an indictment of their sanity but as proof of their goodness.“If anything, the people who moved to Jonestown should be remembered as noble idealists,” Scheeres concludes. “They wanted to create a better, more equitable, society. They wanted their kids to be free of violence and racism. They rejected sex and gender roles. They believed in a dream.”

We are all the same in the grave. Or, as Jonestown’s namesake put it in coded short-wave transmissions from the rainforest commune, “When Mrs. White [death] drops by, she makes us all equal.”

Daniel J. Flynn is the author of Blue Collar Intellectuals: When the Enlightened and the Everyman Elevated America


Print This Page

15 Responses to “The Original Kool-Aid Drinkers”

  1. [...] which examines the events leading to the mass death in the Peoples Temple Agricultural Project, is fairly solid on a factual basis, but takes the wrong lessons from the incident. The cult was born of the idea that socialism was an enlightening experience that could replace [...]

  2. Some people are destined to become bad examples.

  3. Brain dead people seeking spiritual enlightenment = CULT! How could any one poison there children and drink the poison themselves?

  4. I’m sorry, but I couldn’t get past “Jim Jones killed more African Americans than the Ku Klux Klan.” That statement is not based on fact.

  5. Many persist in recalling Jim Jones as an “extremist” Christian, when in fact, as this fine article says, he was a black liberation theologian who used the language and trappings of the Christian faith to hawk his Marxist ideology.

    Jones was the forerunner of today’s “antifa” nihilists.

  6. Of course Mike. He wasn’t a “real” Christian. Just like the Mormons. And the Catholics. Right?

    There are a *lot* of Socialist/Marxist Christians out there: especially in South and Central America. When’s the last time you read the bible; there is quite a bit of material in the New Testament that is no different than what a Socialist or Marxist might say.

    The Bible can be interpreted in many different ways. Some crazy people, like Jim Jones, interpret it in…crazy ways. That makes him…an “extremist Christian”. Don’t feel bad about it – there are extremists in every religious faith. Just don’t try to deny it.

  7. “When’s the last time you read the bible; there is quite a bit of material in the New Testament that is no different than what a Socialist or Marxist might say.”

    Huh?
    Whatever happen to the eight commandment: thou shalt not steal? Not even if you are the government.

    Any community of goods in the Bible/NT such as that in Acts 2:44,45 is voluntary, temporary and not mandated by the civil govt.
    IOW it’s not socialism.

    Ooops.

    Or did you have something else in mind?

  8. I believe “drinking the Kool Aid” is actually a reference to Ken Kesey’s Merry Pranksters–who passed out acid-laced Kool-Aid. So those who “drank the Kool-Aid” were hallucinating and not seeing things rationally.

    But it works either way.

  9. Liberaltarian,

    Did you read the article before commenting? Do you really think a man who prohibits the Bible at his Utopia is just like any other Christian?

    And this: “He wasn’t a “real” Christian. Just like the Mormons. And the Catholics. Right?”

    If you have to resort to putting words into someone’s mouth, you don’t really have an argument. Try again.

  10. I have a theory, and it may be a stretch, but the Left’s turn towards securalism may have been a result of Jonestown. As you stated, a lot of liberal politicians were enamored of Jones from George Moscone to Harvey Milk to even the Carters, probably because they saw his ministry as an extension of the civil rights movement. The horror and embarassment of being associated with Jones I think turned a lot of persons on the Left away from religion as a component of their movements as they were in the 1960s. There were other reasons for this too but I strongly believe Jonestown was one of them.

  11. Speaking of cults, I think I must have stumbled into one on this site or at least someone who has been drinking too much Kool-aid. Here’s a stunning example: ” …but the Left’s turn towards securalism may have been a result of Jonestown.”

    Wow!

  12. If you were an average liberal and you saw 900 dead men, women and children and a U.S. Congressman and fellow Democrat lying in a pool of his own blood on an runway all because of the madness one of ordained minister who promised peace and racial harmony, do you think you would be enamored or religion in wake of such a tragedy or believe it a positive force for your own political or social goals? Think about it.

  13. Exactly where did you learn that “Jim Jones killed more African Americans than the Ku Klux Klan?” If you are going to criticize someone else’s writing of history, make sure you get your own history straight. Exaggerated statements do not do your arguments credit.

    Neither do sophomoric definitions of an ideology such as:
    “Socialism is the submission of the individual to the wishes of the collective.”
    Really? So under capitalism, we never submit our individual will to the wishes of the collective? We don’t collectively pass laws, via a “representative” legislature, to which we must submit individually? We’re anarchists, then?

  14. @Bob S,

    You said:
    “Any community of goods in the Bible/NT such as that in Acts 2:44,45 is voluntary, temporary and not mandated by the civil govt.
    IOW it’s not socialism.”

    Interesting! are you saying, then, that Jim Jones and the People’s Temple weren’t socialists, because they voluntarily gave up their worldly goods to the “church,” without so much as a suggestion from the “civil government” that they do so?
    Or were you trying to say something else?

  15. The KKK reference speaks volumes on where you’re coming from, your hatred and fear of what happened in the 60s, the demonization of the Black Panthers, etc etc.
    Research some of John Judge’s work (and others’). No mention of the obvious CIA involvement with Jones, all the CIA pharmaceuticals. He was a freak, nutjob long before Peoples Temple, a seller of animals to labs, a charismatic fraud.
    I’ve known people who cared for the children before the move to Guyana, and they were decent intelligent human beings, if naive. They and many others quickly saw what was going on but were in mortal danger from speaking out, but they tried to warn authorities anyway, to no avail.
    Good luck on your war on ‘libruls’. Is it satisfying being trapped in a dead paradigm?

Leave a Reply