Takeaways from theamericanconservative.com:
Can Ron Paul lead the Occupy Movement?
Liberals should spend more time with conservatives.
The military-industrial complex braces for defense cuts.
Another Republican internationalist is likely to take charge at the Pentagon.
Takeaways from theamericanconservative.com:
Scott Galupo checks the GOP’s pulse on the fiscal cliff (hint: Obama holds all the cards).
Harvard responds to Ron Unz’s piece on the “hedgefundersity.”
Can Luigi Zingales save American capitalism?
“Whether declared by church or state, the war against human nature is by definition lost.”
How to have a real argument.
So what? Well, marriage is good for individuals, good for the children they produce, and good for society. Study after study has confirmed this wisdom at the heart of most religions. [Jonathan] Last points out, though, that there will be political consequences to the rapid decline of marriage-and-family culture. People who aren’t married tend to be more focused on the here and now, and not thinking of the future, and the obligations to stewardship future-mindedness imposes. Also, if they don’t have families to help take care of them, the state has to step in.
Philip Giraldi questioned the effectiveness of Israel’s Iron Dome:
Consider for a moment the economics of Iron Dome. There are currently five operational units that are towed to the sites where are they deployed. They have cost $50 million each. Israel eventually wants to deploy thirteen of them, all paid for by the US taxpayer. In the recent fighting, the Iron Dome units fired an estimated $25-30 million worth of anti-missile missiles, with a per unit cost of $50,000. The Gazan weapons were largely homemade though sometimes using Iranian avionic parts smuggled in and had no infrastructure costs for the launchers. Most were so-called Qassams, lacking sophistication but costing about $100 to construct. So on a one-to-one basis it costs $50,000 per missile fired from a $50 million launcher to defeat something that might cost $100 to build.
A.G. Gancarski catalogued the slow death of American culture à la “Two and a Half Men”:
If one is trapped in a cubicle for nine hours a day, it is easy enough to see how escapist entertainment like this would serve as a diversion. Those who watch “Two and a Half Men” know–from the promos, the opening scene, and whatever else–that the sordidness of the show is part of the package, and it is a sordidness that is part of the culture now.
This week on theamericanconservative.com, Bruce Bartlett’s soul-searching lamentation over the state of the GOP struck a nerve. Ron Unz’s examination of anti-Asian-American bias in Ivy League admissions policies also created a flutter. Samuel Goldman and Dan McCarthy reacted to Unz’s piece here and here.
Finally, Rod Dreher discovered an unlikely hero.
Today on theamericanconservative.com, Ron Unz’s blockbuster article examining the questionable admissions practices of Ivy League universities continued to attract attention. Samuel Goldman was unconvinced by Unz’s conclusions:
The narrowness of Unz’s definition of academic achievement is connected to a broader defect of the piece. In addition to neglecting students’ ability in the liberal arts, Unz does not consider the liberal arts’ contribution to the university as whole. Unz’s model of meritocracy is Caltech. Not coincidentally, Caltech is an engineering school, which has only a vestigial presence in the humanities and liberal arts. Caltech is a wonderful institution. But would Harvard be more “meritocratic” if its student body and course offerings were more like Caltech’s? Would it be a better university? I doubt it, and not only for reasons of self-esteem.
Finally, Alan Jacobs found value in old educational models.
Today on theamericanconservative.com, Ron Unz examined the questionable admissions practices of Ivy League universities. Unz finds that Asian-Americans are struggling to gain admission into America’s elite universities in numbers commensurate with their talent. Daniel McCarthy has more. Meanwhile, Bruce Bartlett’s piece about his life on the right continues to be a runaway success:
I’ve paid a heavy price, both personal and financial, for my evolution from comfortably within the Republican Party and conservative movement to a less than comfortable position somewhere on the center-left. Honest to God, I am not a liberal or a Democrat. But these days, they are the only people who will listen to me.
Barlett’s lamentation of the GOP’s epistemic closure has already garnered more than 12,000 Facebook likes. It even attracted praise from Bartlett’s former nemesis Paul Krugman.
Finally, Rod Dreher reflected on the Internet and moral freakery.
Today on theamericanconservative.com, Noah Millman put forth a vision of conservatism inspired by the work of Leo Tolstoy. Rod Dreher encouraged this effort and envisioned a different strategy for dealing with objections to evolution.
Scott McConnell noted the House Committee on Foreign Affairs’s blinders on Israel, Daniel Larison expressed relief at American taciturnity in the wake of Iran’s 2009 anti-government protests, and Samuel Goldman found American federalism in rude health. Jon Basil Utley called for cutting military waste, and Brian Doherty reviewed Craig R. Whitney’s Living With Guns: A Liberal’s Case for the Second Amendment.
Today on theamericanconservative.com, Bruce Bartlett reflected on his life on the right, James P. Pinkerton vindicated Israel’s “Iron Dome”, and Samuel Goldman meditated on the usefulness of the liberal arts.
This week on theamericanconservative.com, Michael Brendan Dougherty profiled Pat Buchanan, Scott McConnell and Taki looked back on ten years of The American Conservative, and Tom Woods searched for the elusive “City on a Hill.” Jim Antle identified the libertarian swing vote, and Wick Allison called for a return to fairness.
Rod Dreher and Daniel Larison listed the woes of a defeated GOP and analyzed Bobby Jindal’s presidential ambitions. Dreher also compiled a list of promising and has-been conservatives, spoke of his love for Starbucks, and responded to Alan Jacobs’s post about the decline of free speech in higher education. Samuel Goldman addressed the blind spot of liberalism. Noah Millman and Jacobs discussed the politics of climate change. Jacobs also dissected the meaning of the widely used term, “the common good,” listed his favorite Wikipedia pages, while Millman reflected on the material basis of a marriage culture.
Jack Hunter examined the failed policies of David Petraeus, Philip Giraldi visited New Jersey, Scott McConnell contextualized the ongoing violence in Gaza, Scott Galupo poked holes in Romney’s assessment of his own defeat, and Jordan Bloom noted Rand Paul’s courting of the Latino vote.
Today on theamericanconservative.com, Philip Giraldi assessed Washington’s engagement with the Taliban. Rod Dreher listed conservatives worth listening to, noted Israel’s assassination of a Hamas operative, and the woes of a defeated GOP. Daniel Larison also listed the weaknesses of the GOP, questioned Bobby Jindal’s commitment to populist reform, and Scott Galupo and he poked holes in Romney’s assessment of his own defeat. Michael Brendan Dougherty suggested a return to Buchananite principles and Alan Jacobs listed his favorite Wikipedia pages.