<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Champagne Wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/10/07/champagne-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/10/07/champagne-wars/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=champagne-wars</link>
	<description>@TAC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:36:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony J</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/10/07/champagne-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-10427</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2225#comment-10427</guid>
		<description>The problem over here in Britain is that there is simply no ideological difference between the New Labour brand and the New Tories led by Cameron. Or, to put it more graphically, the only choice in next year&#039;s election is between another course of the shit-sandwich on a red plate, which you&#039;ve tasted and found to taste like a shit-sandwich, or the only other item on the menu, a shit-sandwich on a blue plate.

  No one - wants- to vote Tory, any more than they did in 2005, when Brown portrayed a vote for Labour as a vote for the guy who always had and always would hate Tony Blair more than anyone else in the country, and won Labour another term in office on those terms. But giving the country another term of Blairite policies, only without the talent for PR, Brown has handed the Tories an almost certain victory next year. 

  All the Tories have to do - and which they are doing - is keep their policies vague, the bulk of their shadow front-bench off TV, and wait for the protest votes to pile up in their favour. Then they&#039;ll claim a mandate for the kind of extremist right-wing slash-and-burn policies Thatcher only dreamed of, rightly confident that Labour will tear itself apart for a couple of election cycles in a civil-war between the New Labour rump and genuine Labour challengers.

  In the meantime, the nation gets another round of those tasty shit-sandwiches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem over here in Britain is that there is simply no ideological difference between the New Labour brand and the New Tories led by Cameron. Or, to put it more graphically, the only choice in next year&#8217;s election is between another course of the shit-sandwich on a red plate, which you&#8217;ve tasted and found to taste like a shit-sandwich, or the only other item on the menu, a shit-sandwich on a blue plate.</p>
<p>  No one &#8211; wants- to vote Tory, any more than they did in 2005, when Brown portrayed a vote for Labour as a vote for the guy who always had and always would hate Tony Blair more than anyone else in the country, and won Labour another term in office on those terms. But giving the country another term of Blairite policies, only without the talent for PR, Brown has handed the Tories an almost certain victory next year. </p>
<p>  All the Tories have to do &#8211; and which they are doing &#8211; is keep their policies vague, the bulk of their shadow front-bench off TV, and wait for the protest votes to pile up in their favour. Then they&#8217;ll claim a mandate for the kind of extremist right-wing slash-and-burn policies Thatcher only dreamed of, rightly confident that Labour will tear itself apart for a couple of election cycles in a civil-war between the New Labour rump and genuine Labour challengers.</p>
<p>  In the meantime, the nation gets another round of those tasty shit-sandwiches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/10/07/champagne-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-10424</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2225#comment-10424</guid>
		<description>Honestly, haven&#039;t these people got better things to do than trick tories into sipping bubbly? You would have thought they could have come up with something more creative. 

Personally I would have wound down the window of my rolls and asked: &quot;Pardon me, would you have any Gray Poupon?&quot;

But of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, haven&#8217;t these people got better things to do than trick tories into sipping bubbly? You would have thought they could have come up with something more creative. </p>
<p>Personally I would have wound down the window of my rolls and asked: &#8220;Pardon me, would you have any Gray Poupon?&#8221;</p>
<p>But of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

