<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney and Santorum&#8217;s Missile Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=romney-and-santorums-missile-defense</link>
	<description>@TAC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitt needs a shrink, not an office</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9803</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitt needs a shrink, not an office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9803</guid>
		<description>In readings, the NATO proposal may have had something to do with Obama&#039;s statement; in other news sources, the ship which was hijacked had missiles on board headed to Iran from Russia.  We may not know everything going on behind the scenes. 

However, 

The Russian threat is real, but missiles will not stop it “A crime subculture is spreading in Russia, and it is attaining the status of official culture.”

In judging a nation, one should look at all aspects of a nation, a Trojan Horse does not need to house a multitude.

I am not sure how a missile shield can protect other nations from a growing crime wave.  

Other concerns with Russia is it move towards influencing world energy, it movements in Africa and elsewhere, shows a growing spread of influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In readings, the NATO proposal may have had something to do with Obama&#8217;s statement; in other news sources, the ship which was hijacked had missiles on board headed to Iran from Russia.  We may not know everything going on behind the scenes. </p>
<p>However, </p>
<p>The Russian threat is real, but missiles will not stop it “A crime subculture is spreading in Russia, and it is attaining the status of official culture.”</p>
<p>In judging a nation, one should look at all aspects of a nation, a Trojan Horse does not need to house a multitude.</p>
<p>I am not sure how a missile shield can protect other nations from a growing crime wave.  </p>
<p>Other concerns with Russia is it move towards influencing world energy, it movements in Africa and elsewhere, shows a growing spread of influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9798</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9798</guid>
		<description>Romney and Santorum are irrelevant to the real question, which is to what extent Russia poses a threat to the U.S. or Central and Western Europe. 

Russia under the tsars indeed had a history of expansionism, but it never went very far westward. This changed dramatically under Communism, as the Soviet Union picked up a wide swatch of client states. 

But even into Stalin&#039;s time Russia&#039;s population was growing. Not so today. Russia is losing population faster than any other European country. I think this makes it less and less likely that Russia will return to a policy of expansionism. Every year that passes makes it more difficult for Russia to engage in military adventures.

As for Star Wars bringing down the Soviet Union, no it didn&#039;t, and neither did America&#039;s general increase in military expenditures. This is a fable that conservatives have touted for a long time. It sounds good, but it makes little sense. 

The Soviet Union&#039;s economy did not collapse because it tried to keep parity with American military expenditures--it couldn&#039;t, never had been able to, and didn&#039;t much try during the Reagan years. Its economy collapsed because it was founded on a false economic theory and, eventually, was going to collapse anyway. The regime just couldn&#039;t keep up the facade any longer, and the spirit had gone out of the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney and Santorum are irrelevant to the real question, which is to what extent Russia poses a threat to the U.S. or Central and Western Europe. </p>
<p>Russia under the tsars indeed had a history of expansionism, but it never went very far westward. This changed dramatically under Communism, as the Soviet Union picked up a wide swatch of client states. </p>
<p>But even into Stalin&#8217;s time Russia&#8217;s population was growing. Not so today. Russia is losing population faster than any other European country. I think this makes it less and less likely that Russia will return to a policy of expansionism. Every year that passes makes it more difficult for Russia to engage in military adventures.</p>
<p>As for Star Wars bringing down the Soviet Union, no it didn&#8217;t, and neither did America&#8217;s general increase in military expenditures. This is a fable that conservatives have touted for a long time. It sounds good, but it makes little sense. </p>
<p>The Soviet Union&#8217;s economy did not collapse because it tried to keep parity with American military expenditures&#8211;it couldn&#8217;t, never had been able to, and didn&#8217;t much try during the Reagan years. Its economy collapsed because it was founded on a false economic theory and, eventually, was going to collapse anyway. The regime just couldn&#8217;t keep up the facade any longer, and the spirit had gone out of the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitt needs a shink, not an office</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9795</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitt needs a shink, not an office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9795</guid>
		<description>The few hours with the dog on top, was 12 hours,as one recalls reading, it was a drive to Canada, as understood.  Canada is where the Romney family had a home on lake Michigan since Mitt was a child.

There is much more which can discredit Romney besides the nit wit putting his dog on top of his car. They treat women and kids worst, and their cronies  make sure of it.

Offer still stand, bring brother Scott along at lets talk about the Russian links, and why someone and their kids were brutally gone after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The few hours with the dog on top, was 12 hours,as one recalls reading, it was a drive to Canada, as understood.  Canada is where the Romney family had a home on lake Michigan since Mitt was a child.</p>
<p>There is much more which can discredit Romney besides the nit wit putting his dog on top of his car. They treat women and kids worst, and their cronies  make sure of it.</p>
<p>Offer still stand, bring brother Scott along at lets talk about the Russian links, and why someone and their kids were brutally gone after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9793</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not Romney&#039;s personal assistant. All I know is that in trying to discredit Romney, the media was so desperate that that had to run a story about him having his dog (in a carrier, behind a wind shield) on top of his car for a few hours while traveling on vacation. If there was even the slightest credible hint of a bogus connection with Russia, especially during the Georgian invasion, they would have been running it constantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not Romney&#8217;s personal assistant. All I know is that in trying to discredit Romney, the media was so desperate that that had to run a story about him having his dog (in a carrier, behind a wind shield) on top of his car for a few hours while traveling on vacation. If there was even the slightest credible hint of a bogus connection with Russia, especially during the Georgian invasion, they would have been running it constantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bodio</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9792</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bodio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9792</guid>
		<description>...“a system that won’t work, against a threat that doesn’t exist, paid for with money we don’t have.”

Sounds like Obamacare!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;“a system that won’t work, against a threat that doesn’t exist, paid for with money we don’t have.”</p>
<p>Sounds like Obamacare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missile defense shield: still a stupid idea &#124; The blog of Nathan Hunstad</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9756</link>
		<dc:creator>Missile defense shield: still a stupid idea &#124; The blog of Nathan Hunstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9756</guid>
		<description>[...] over this cancellation, saying that we are turning our backs on our allies or giving in to Russia. Not all conservatives are this insane, however. It is rather sad and telling that some conservatives would defend &quot;a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over this cancellation, saying that we are turning our backs on our allies or giving in to Russia. Not all conservatives are this insane, however. It is rather sad and telling that some conservatives would defend &quot;a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitt needs a shink, not an office</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9746</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitt needs a shink, not an office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9746</guid>
		<description>If Romney is about strong defense for America, why was he in a business deal with China to buy an American defense company, which would have compromised our nations security.

Romney is in the business of putting his money in his pocket, and the office of president would pour more money into the Romney trust fund coffers.

Offer stands Romney, both Mitt and Scott, all three of us see if Sandy Rios is willing to host an interview where we talk about the Russian Connections with the Romney family and their associates, and issues revolving around these associations and connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Romney is about strong defense for America, why was he in a business deal with China to buy an American defense company, which would have compromised our nations security.</p>
<p>Romney is in the business of putting his money in his pocket, and the office of president would pour more money into the Romney trust fund coffers.</p>
<p>Offer stands Romney, both Mitt and Scott, all three of us see if Sandy Rios is willing to host an interview where we talk about the Russian Connections with the Romney family and their associates, and issues revolving around these associations and connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9741</guid>
		<description>Tick off Eastern European allies, so that we can save money for Afganistan and increased domestic spending.  What&#039;s worse is I doubt this decision was about a disengagement from the affairs of Russia and its neighbors, but rather it was a temporary shift of focus to other interventions.  Obama keeps scoring points with Paleos, but I don&#039;t buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tick off Eastern European allies, so that we can save money for Afganistan and increased domestic spending.  What&#8217;s worse is I doubt this decision was about a disengagement from the affairs of Russia and its neighbors, but rather it was a temporary shift of focus to other interventions.  Obama keeps scoring points with Paleos, but I don&#8217;t buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9739</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9739</guid>
		<description>You commenters appear to be silly liberals. Like ostriches with your heads in the sand.  You perceive no threats and pass the responsibility to those little able to protect themselves.  You really want to take that chance with our life and liberty?

 A strong defense is conservative!  Gains in technology have made missile defense possible and the United States prides itself on being state of the art at everything.  Romney and all conservatives, myself included, are all about strengthening our defenses. Its the foundation of a free nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You commenters appear to be silly liberals. Like ostriches with your heads in the sand.  You perceive no threats and pass the responsibility to those little able to protect themselves.  You really want to take that chance with our life and liberty?</p>
<p> A strong defense is conservative!  Gains in technology have made missile defense possible and the United States prides itself on being state of the art at everything.  Romney and all conservatives, myself included, are all about strengthening our defenses. Its the foundation of a free nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntiPartisan</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9733</link>
		<dc:creator>AntiPartisan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9733</guid>
		<description>And this is why Republicans will lose the Presidency in 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is why Republicans will lose the Presidency in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitt needs a shink, not an office</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9730</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitt needs a shink, not an office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9730</guid>
		<description>Jim, here is a challenge:

If Mitt and his brother Scott, will be willing to have an interview  and talk about the Russian connection with the Romney family and  issues revolving around this —-  the Sandy Rios talk show on WYLL Chicago, is a good place to meet, if Ms. Rios is willing. Value Voters listen to her program and can we can see if it is” imagined and outlandish claims”, as they well know it is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, here is a challenge:</p>
<p>If Mitt and his brother Scott, will be willing to have an interview  and talk about the Russian connection with the Romney family and  issues revolving around this —-  the Sandy Rios talk show on WYLL Chicago, is a good place to meet, if Ms. Rios is willing. Value Voters listen to her program and can we can see if it is” imagined and outlandish claims”, as they well know it is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9726</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9726</guid>
		<description>Karl:

There hasn&#039;t been a period in history when Russian didn&#039;t have internal issues that should have their main concern. It isn&#039;t in Russia&#039;s nature to worry about internal issues, instead they seem to always strive to be a major player in world politics. Having lived in Russia, I know that many Russians still refer to the CCCP days as the golden days. The days where they were a super power, the days when they beat America to space. Any means for them to get back on the world stage and to create a little nationalism among its citizens should be considered a real threat. Look at Georgia! 
Plus we aren&#039;t helping these EU countries out with these defenses because we feel like they can&#039;t afford them. We are building ties that will yield huge economic and political pay offs down the road. These types of national affairs are obviously one of the many things that Mr. Community organizer never learned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl:</p>
<p>There hasn&#8217;t been a period in history when Russian didn&#8217;t have internal issues that should have their main concern. It isn&#8217;t in Russia&#8217;s nature to worry about internal issues, instead they seem to always strive to be a major player in world politics. Having lived in Russia, I know that many Russians still refer to the CCCP days as the golden days. The days where they were a super power, the days when they beat America to space. Any means for them to get back on the world stage and to create a little nationalism among its citizens should be considered a real threat. Look at Georgia!<br />
Plus we aren&#8217;t helping these EU countries out with these defenses because we feel like they can&#8217;t afford them. We are building ties that will yield huge economic and political pay offs down the road. These types of national affairs are obviously one of the many things that Mr. Community organizer never learned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitt needs a shink, not an office</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9725</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitt needs a shink, not an office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9725</guid>
		<description>Karl, 

I read the article on Russia population imploding, there are two other elements in the demographics and those are ‘value’ elements.  One is the divorce has reached high levels, with children having absent fathers, and “A crime subculture is spreading in Russia, and it is attaining the status of official culture.”

In judging a nation, one should look at all aspects of a nation, a Trojan Horse does not need to house a multitude. 

I am not sure how a missile shield can protect other nations for a growing crime wave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl, </p>
<p>I read the article on Russia population imploding, there are two other elements in the demographics and those are ‘value’ elements.  One is the divorce has reached high levels, with children having absent fathers, and “A crime subculture is spreading in Russia, and it is attaining the status of official culture.”</p>
<p>In judging a nation, one should look at all aspects of a nation, a Trojan Horse does not need to house a multitude. </p>
<p>I am not sure how a missile shield can protect other nations for a growing crime wave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Rurik</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9716</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Rurik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9716</guid>
		<description>Call me a Neanderthal, I still am suspicious of Russia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me a Neanderthal, I still am suspicious of Russia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed Merrill</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/17/romney-and-santorums-missile-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-9709</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed Merrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2168#comment-9709</guid>
		<description>Mitt Romney 2012!

Santorum would make a good running mate, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney 2012!</p>
<p>Santorum would make a good running mate, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

