<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Klein Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/01/the-klein-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/01/the-klein-doctrine/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-klein-doctrine</link>
	<description>@TAC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:36:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattSwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/01/the-klein-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-9472</link>
		<dc:creator>MattSwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2123#comment-9472</guid>
		<description>Norwegian Shooter,

Speaking of reading things out rather than typing up fleeting impulses, if you re-read (read) his post, you&#039;ll notice that Mr. Gray never actually accused Ms. Klein of hypocrisy.

He did accuse her of being over-rated and celebrity-seeking. These charges are harder to refute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norwegian Shooter,</p>
<p>Speaking of reading things out rather than typing up fleeting impulses, if you re-read (read) his post, you&#8217;ll notice that Mr. Gray never actually accused Ms. Klein of hypocrisy.</p>
<p>He did accuse her of being over-rated and celebrity-seeking. These charges are harder to refute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norwegian Shooter</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/01/the-klein-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-9455</link>
		<dc:creator>Norwegian Shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2123#comment-9455</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome. To you, that is what blogging is all about. Maybe if I had a blogging gig, I&#039;d agree with you. Anyway, I appreciate your honesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome. To you, that is what blogging is all about. Maybe if I had a blogging gig, I&#8217;d agree with you. Anyway, I appreciate your honesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/01/the-klein-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-9452</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2123#comment-9452</guid>
		<description>Spot on, Norwegian Shooter. Thank you. But I am afraid that typing up fleeting impulses is what blogging is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on, Norwegian Shooter. Thank you. But I am afraid that typing up fleeting impulses is what blogging is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norwegian Shooter</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/01/the-klein-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-9450</link>
		<dc:creator>Norwegian Shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2123#comment-9450</guid>
		<description>What a hatchet job. You know you should stop and think about actually publishing a post that begins: &quot;There is something a bit creepy about... .&quot; I&#039;m glad that you actually did stop, but typing your fleeting impulses, and then ignoring them, isn&#039;t thinking. 

Also, thanks for admitting you didn&#039;t read The Shock Doctrine. You didn&#039;t read No Logo either, or even Google it, as promoting your own brand - that of an individual - is not hypocritical from someone who attacks multinational corporate branding and decries it&#039;s effects on people. I don&#039;t think Klein&#039;s branding has hurt anyone. You obviously quite enjoy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a hatchet job. You know you should stop and think about actually publishing a post that begins: &#8220;There is something a bit creepy about&#8230; .&#8221; I&#8217;m glad that you actually did stop, but typing your fleeting impulses, and then ignoring them, isn&#8217;t thinking. </p>
<p>Also, thanks for admitting you didn&#8217;t read The Shock Doctrine. You didn&#8217;t read No Logo either, or even Google it, as promoting your own brand &#8211; that of an individual &#8211; is not hypocritical from someone who attacks multinational corporate branding and decries it&#8217;s effects on people. I don&#8217;t think Klein&#8217;s branding has hurt anyone. You obviously quite enjoy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattSwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/09/01/the-klein-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-9426</link>
		<dc:creator>MattSwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2123#comment-9426</guid>
		<description>They ought to be prouder of Cockburn and relatively more ashamed of her. I wonder if the problem in the documentary arose when she and the director came to the point of writing about what the positive alternative to &quot;Disaster Capitalism&quot; would be.

I&#039;m not sure, though. It might have been about something as mundane as splitting the profits...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They ought to be prouder of Cockburn and relatively more ashamed of her. I wonder if the problem in the documentary arose when she and the director came to the point of writing about what the positive alternative to &#8220;Disaster Capitalism&#8221; would be.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure, though. It might have been about something as mundane as splitting the profits&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

