<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrity Randians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=celebrity-randians</link>
	<description>@TAC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:36:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hardesty</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8718</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hardesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8718</guid>
		<description>Are we still arguing Darwin here ? Many
atheists are libertarians or Objectivists
or anarcho-capitalists, not liberals or Marxists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we still arguing Darwin here ? Many<br />
atheists are libertarians or Objectivists<br />
or anarcho-capitalists, not liberals or Marxists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony M</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8692</guid>
		<description>Jeremiah is right. Why is this news? If not Rand, it would be some liberal, darwinist or atheist b.s they have as their lifeforce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremiah is right. Why is this news? If not Rand, it would be some liberal, darwinist or atheist b.s they have as their lifeforce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8633</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8633</guid>
		<description>Moderation took a while, Michael. Sorry for the delay. I&#039;m approving the comments while I&#039;m on the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moderation took a while, Michael. Sorry for the delay. I&#8217;m approving the comments while I&#8217;m on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hardesty</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8629</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hardesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8629</guid>
		<description>What happened to the comment I just left a few minutes ago ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the comment I just left a few minutes ago ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hardesty</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8626</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hardesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8626</guid>
		<description>NGW, that&#039;s sad. Since Rand loves man and man is part of nature how could she hate nature per se ? She loathed statist environmentalists, there is a difference. On atheism just break it up with an extra syllable, a-theist. Like theist
but with an extra letter. 
Jack, yes.
George, twenty times in forty nine years.
Jeremiah, all those big words ! Wow ! Always nice to have the Portable Kirk nearby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NGW, that&#8217;s sad. Since Rand loves man and man is part of nature how could she hate nature per se ? She loathed statist environmentalists, there is a difference. On atheism just break it up with an extra syllable, a-theist. Like theist<br />
but with an extra letter.<br />
Jack, yes.<br />
George, twenty times in forty nine years.<br />
Jeremiah, all those big words ! Wow ! Always nice to have the Portable Kirk nearby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NGW</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8623</link>
		<dc:creator>NGW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8623</guid>
		<description>I thought it was great at 23, i read the fountainhead five times..but some things always bugged me about Rand, her atheism, her hatred of nature, now, at 43, I can&#039;t read her writing without wincing and feeling slightly embarrassed about myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was great at 23, i read the fountainhead five times..but some things always bugged me about Rand, her atheism, her hatred of nature, now, at 43, I can&#8217;t read her writing without wincing and feeling slightly embarrassed about myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8621</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8621</guid>
		<description>Pretty impressive, Mr Hardesty.  So, do you know Brad Pitt, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty impressive, Mr Hardesty.  So, do you know Brad Pitt, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Hawley</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8606</link>
		<dc:creator>George Hawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8606</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve learned something during my short time here at AmCon: if you want a lot of comments, say something unkind about Ayn Rand.

Atlas Shrugs 20 times? Apparently Objectivists have a lot of time on their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve learned something during my short time here at AmCon: if you want a lot of comments, say something unkind about Ayn Rand.</p>
<p>Atlas Shrugs 20 times? Apparently Objectivists have a lot of time on their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Whitmoore</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8602</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Whitmoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8602</guid>
		<description>So a scattering of execrable celebrities seek to justify their loathsome avarice with the philosophy of egoism, godlessness, and narcissism. Hardly unsurprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a scattering of execrable celebrities seek to justify their loathsome avarice with the philosophy of egoism, godlessness, and narcissism. Hardly unsurprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hardesty</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8598</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hardesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8598</guid>
		<description>Brad Pitt&#039;s quote was about Atlas Shrugged.
As far as Greenspan goes if he had been an
acolyte of Objectivism he never would have
taken the Fed job. In the 60s he called for
the abolition of the Fed.
Chambers&#039; review was pathetic and any village
sophist can rebut it. As have the subsequent
attacks by Evans, Rockwell, ad nauseum, in
NR. I knew Rand and her husband, I&#039;ve read Atlas
20 times cover to cover and The Fountainhead
a dozen times plus all of her published corpus. 
Her acolytes at ARI bother me because they
are Jewish Zionist fanatics except a few of the
equally disgusting goy types like Locke.
Peikoff in his massive History of Western 
Philosophy audio series refutes every Catholic
premise, Tom P. Sorry. One reason there are
many more of us ex-Catholics than believers.
Atlas should be a TV series, only that would do it
justice. Pitt is better looking and has more intelligence
than both Jacks above. 
As far as emotionalism goes you ever listen to the moronic
rightwing am talk shows with their imbecilic callers ?
The Left is bad but they have no monopoly on irrationalism
as the above posters prove.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad Pitt&#8217;s quote was about Atlas Shrugged.<br />
As far as Greenspan goes if he had been an<br />
acolyte of Objectivism he never would have<br />
taken the Fed job. In the 60s he called for<br />
the abolition of the Fed.<br />
Chambers&#8217; review was pathetic and any village<br />
sophist can rebut it. As have the subsequent<br />
attacks by Evans, Rockwell, ad nauseum, in<br />
NR. I knew Rand and her husband, I&#8217;ve read Atlas<br />
20 times cover to cover and The Fountainhead<br />
a dozen times plus all of her published corpus.<br />
Her acolytes at ARI bother me because they<br />
are Jewish Zionist fanatics except a few of the<br />
equally disgusting goy types like Locke.<br />
Peikoff in his massive History of Western<br />
Philosophy audio series refutes every Catholic<br />
premise, Tom P. Sorry. One reason there are<br />
many more of us ex-Catholics than believers.<br />
Atlas should be a TV series, only that would do it<br />
justice. Pitt is better looking and has more intelligence<br />
than both Jacks above.<br />
As far as emotionalism goes you ever listen to the moronic<br />
rightwing am talk shows with their imbecilic callers ?<br />
The Left is bad but they have no monopoly on irrationalism<br />
as the above posters prove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8581</guid>
		<description>&quot;Celebrity fans of the cult of selfishness&quot;?  Well, at least these celebrities don&#039;t hate poor people like you conservatives do.  

Were any of those quoted in that video where celebrities declared their devotion to Obama?  If not, they&#039;d better be on the next one, now that they&#039;ve been called out.

Pitt is a dope.  Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Celebrity fans of the cult of selfishness&#8221;?  Well, at least these celebrities don&#8217;t hate poor people like you conservatives do.  </p>
<p>Were any of those quoted in that video where celebrities declared their devotion to Obama?  If not, they&#8217;d better be on the next one, now that they&#8217;ve been called out.</p>
<p>Pitt is a dope.  Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8577</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8577</guid>
		<description>What I have noticed myself was that a lot of very ditzy liberal-leftists on Myspace or whatever would have The Fountainhead right up there with some New Left author or even Marx among their favorite books.  I can&#039;t say I&#039;m surprised that the HuffPo crowd never does anything out of their subjective feelings, only out of reason . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I have noticed myself was that a lot of very ditzy liberal-leftists on Myspace or whatever would have The Fountainhead right up there with some New Left author or even Marx among their favorite books.  I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m surprised that the HuffPo crowd never does anything out of their subjective feelings, only out of reason . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley Vlahos</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8574</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley Vlahos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8574</guid>
		<description>I love Brad Pitt: &quot;[The Fountainhead] is so dense and complex, it would have to be a six-hour movie.&quot;

Gary Cooper? Patricia Neal? 114 minutes? 1949? What a dope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Brad Pitt: &#8220;[The Fountainhead] is so dense and complex, it would have to be a six-hour movie.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gary Cooper? Patricia Neal? 114 minutes? 1949? What a dope</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Piatak</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/08/05/celebrity-randians/comment-page-1/#comment-8571</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Piatak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2084#comment-8571</guid>
		<description>Whittaker Chambers was right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whittaker Chambers was right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

