AG Holder May Act After Torture Accounts “Turned my Stomach”
Gruesome details of the CIA’s interrogation practices may be on the way. Government lawyers are reportedly meeting tomorrow to consider “accelerating” the release of a long-awaited inspector general’s report that could blow apart the Republicans’ best attempt to underplay the torture issue and to dissuade the White House from pursuing a probe into the Bush Administration’s troubling execution of the so-called War on Terror.
According to an article by Daniel Klaidman published in Newsweek on Saturday, Attorney General Eric Holder may reverse the Obama Administration’s earlier stance not “to look backwards” at potential improprieties and crimes of the Bush Administration. In fact, he may now be leaning toward appointing a prosecutor to investigate “brutal interrogation practices,” in Bush and Cheney’s terror war.
An announcement may come as “in a matter of weeks.” Such a decision, Klaidman writes, “would roil the country, would likely plunge Washington into a new round of partisan warfare, and could even imperil Obama’s domestic priorities, including health care and energy reform. Holder knows all this, and he has been wrestling with the question for months”
Apparently, according to Klaidman, Holder read and was emotionally impacted by the CIA inspector general’s report on interrogation abuses — the one the ACLU has been fighting to get released in full but so far the White House has delayed several times. Now, as Spencer Ackerman at The Washington Independent reports, government lawyers may be meeting on Wednesday to consider “accelerating its schedule of production.”
The Klaidman piece is mostly a padded profile of Holder (asserting the portrait of a career prosecutor, gently independent of White House politics, loyal to his DOJ roots), but buried inside is the obvious trial balloon (emphasis mine):
As he pored over reports and listened to briefings, he became increasingly troubled. There were startling indications that some interrogators had gone far beyond what had been authorized in the legal opinions issued by the Justice Department, which were themselves controversial. He told one intimate that what he saw “turned my stomach.”
It was soon clear to Holder that he might have to launch an investigation to determine whether crimes were committed under the Bush administration and prosecutions warranted. The obstacles were obvious. For a new administration to reach back and investigate its predecessor is rare, if not unprecedented. After having been deeply involved in the decision to authorize Ken Starr to investigate Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky, Holder well knew how politicized things could get. He worried about the impact on the CIA, whose operatives would be at the center of any probe. And he could clearly read the signals coming out of the White House. President Obama had already deflected the left wing of his party and human-rights organizations by saying, “We should be looking forward and not backwards” when it came to Bush-era abuses.
Still, Holder couldn’t shake what he had learned in reports about the treatment of prisoners at the CIA’s “black sites.” If the public knew the details, he and his aides figured, there would be a groundswell of support for an independent probe.
If this IG report is finally released, un-redacted, it could be the Republicans’ worst nightmare (and Obama’s, if the White House truly is determined to plow through with “domestic priorities” rather than hold the Bush Administration responsible for these alleged crimes). Holder reportedly read a copy of the report twice in June the first time as a prosecutor, “the second time, he started to absorb what he was reading at a more emotional level. He was ‘shocked and saddened,’ he told a friend, by what government servants were alleged to have done in America’s name.”
We’ll see if the White House, too, is “shocked” enough to follow this through.
UPDATE: Another sympathetic profile of Holder. One wonders.
UPDATE II : Looks like we’re going to have to wait for that unclassified IG report a little longer: Spencer Ackerman is now reporting that the government was granted another delay for its release — until Aug. 24.




Just in time for the 2012 cycle. Imagine that.
Frankly, I’d sooner believe that full disclosure would help the Obama administration’s agenda, rather than hinder it. It’d put the GOP hard on the defensive – compared to now, where they’re clearly playing a blocking game.
By now, it’s clear to anybody paying attention that the GOP’s strategy is simple – block like h*ll, figuring that a sh*tty economy will be blamed on the Presidential party by the American people in 2010. Given a few more Senate seats plus the half- to full-dozen Democratic Senators who delight in voting Republican, plus the increase in GOP morale, and Obama might be essentially stalled until 2012.
[at which time who knows, but one takes it as one can].
Given this, (almost) anything which hurts the GOP will help Obama. He’s not playing with even hard bargaining opposition, but with enemies who are clearly will to play negative-sum games.
I agree with Barry,though I am sure I’m his political opposite.
Cheney has been demanding full disclosure, so let’s give it to him.
Instead, all we get is hints, and denigration of “the last 8 years”. Sure seems like somebody has something to hide. Is it the GOP (or are we trying to distract from Cap And Tax, and the Healthcare Takeover, and the disaster that the economy is headed to, under the Obama-Deception?)
If Kelley Vlahos has knowledge of the contents of the CIA IG report then Vlahos is morally obligated to reveal the contents to the public. It is not just unconscienable that a journalist withold such information, witholding it makes the journalist a party to the hidden crimes of any number of government officials. This applies to Daniel Klaidman, too, of course, and to Newsweek. I am glad to see that the American Conservative is willing to credit Newsweek’s reporters on this issue, since TAC is probably unable to develop such important information on its own. It is important that the Bush administration is ‘burned and salted’ so that the present trend toward progressive change in America is sustained.
Great, bring it on Holder- you partisan toady.
Obama really kicked an ant hill with his ill-advised and politically motivated release of Bush Administration memos regarding EITs. Surely he regrets it, but he’ll just double-down with an investigation of the CIA now.
But Obama, Pelosi, and Holder seem to have forgot something: the CIA KILLS people… it’s in their job description- Did these twits really think that these killers were going to just meekly take-one-for-the-team… when the team captain is a lying, incompetent, arrogant nebbish who has basically told them they need to kiss his ring? -please
Let’s have a hearing and get it all out there, shall we? Then just watch the rats scatter who in 2006-07 attacked George W Bush for protecting the country from terrorist attack… but who clearly knew what was going on five years before we heard a peep out of them-
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com
Great, bring it on Holder- you partisan toady.
Obama really kicked an ant hill with his ill-advised and politically motivated release of Bush Administration memos regarding EITs. Surely he regrets it, but he’ll just double-down with an investigation of the CIA now.
But Obama, Pelosi, and Holder seem to have forgot something: the CIA KILLS people… it’s in their job description- Did these twits really think that these killers were going to just meekly take-one-for-the-team… when the team captain is a lying, incompetent, arrogant nebbish who has basically told them they need to kiss his ring? -please
Let’s have a hearing and get it all out there, shall we? Then just watch the rats scatter who in 2006-07 attacked George W Bush for protecting the country from terrorist attack… but who clearly knew what was going on five years before we heard a peep out of them-