Comments on: Vanity Blair http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/06/24/vanity-blair/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=vanity-blair @TAC Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:36:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: R J Stove http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/06/24/vanity-blair/comment-page-1/#comment-7471 R J Stove Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:14:22 +0000 http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1937#comment-7471 Is Hitchens really Sir Christopher these days? Well, I suppose if we have Sir Elton John and Sir Mick Jagger, the dignity of knighthood has been so compromised as to be nonexistent, so it might as well be Sir Christopher as anyone else. Is Hitchens really Sir Christopher these days? Well, I suppose if we have Sir Elton John and Sir Mick Jagger, the dignity of knighthood has been so compromised as to be nonexistent, so it might as well be Sir Christopher as anyone else.

]]> By: MattSwartz http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/06/24/vanity-blair/comment-page-1/#comment-7468 MattSwartz Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:44:20 +0000 http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1937#comment-7468 I couldn't make it through. The interplay between the unctuous editor and the former PM proved intolerable after about two minutes. Vanity Fair isn't a complete waste, though. They have good, long articles and heir Madoff coverage is the best I've seen. I couldn’t make it through. The interplay between the unctuous editor and the former PM proved intolerable after about two minutes.

Vanity Fair isn’t a complete waste, though.

They have good, long articles and heir Madoff coverage is the best I’ve seen.

]]>