<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bibi Wins, Barack Loses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bibi-wins-barack-loses</link>
	<description>@TAC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:36:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Majumder</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6650</link>
		<dc:creator>Majumder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 01:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6650</guid>
		<description>&quot;Barack had best understand. The crowd manipulating him into war with Iran has in mind, first, obliterating Iran; second, getting rid of him.&quot;


I am intellectually indebted to Mr. Patrick J. Buchanan for his telling the truth all along and who has not sold his soul for big money in America.

The above mentioned quote tells all that we needed to know.


However, just to add to Mr. Buchanan&#039;s writing...

America never attacks a country that has political will to defend itself with nuclear weapons of mass destruction. 

History is guide, America always attacks a country that does not have nuclear weapons of mass destruction.

Pres. Bush did not attack Iran not because he had deeply seated love for it, but because it would have been too costly for America to do so.

Israel always wants America do its dirty work notwithstanding the fact that hundreds of billions of U.S. tax-payers dollars are annually poured into that socialist state!

In any case, I strongly believe we need many more Patrick J. Buchanans in this nation and around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Barack had best understand. The crowd manipulating him into war with Iran has in mind, first, obliterating Iran; second, getting rid of him.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am intellectually indebted to Mr. Patrick J. Buchanan for his telling the truth all along and who has not sold his soul for big money in America.</p>
<p>The above mentioned quote tells all that we needed to know.</p>
<p>However, just to add to Mr. Buchanan&#8217;s writing&#8230;</p>
<p>America never attacks a country that has political will to defend itself with nuclear weapons of mass destruction. </p>
<p>History is guide, America always attacks a country that does not have nuclear weapons of mass destruction.</p>
<p>Pres. Bush did not attack Iran not because he had deeply seated love for it, but because it would have been too costly for America to do so.</p>
<p>Israel always wants America do its dirty work notwithstanding the fact that hundreds of billions of U.S. tax-payers dollars are annually poured into that socialist state!</p>
<p>In any case, I strongly believe we need many more Patrick J. Buchanans in this nation and around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john adams</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6647</link>
		<dc:creator>john adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6647</guid>
		<description>Great article Pat. What I think is extremely important is to examine the US media laws and whether they are being violated by AIPAC and people like Mort Zuckerman. The same cast of characters which started Iraqtophobia and hard a work about Iran. Iran poses no threat to the U.S. and it&#039;s interests in the region. Israel is a different story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Pat. What I think is extremely important is to examine the US media laws and whether they are being violated by AIPAC and people like Mort Zuckerman. The same cast of characters which started Iraqtophobia and hard a work about Iran. Iran poses no threat to the U.S. and it&#8217;s interests in the region. Israel is a different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomT</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6618</link>
		<dc:creator>TomT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 13:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6618</guid>
		<description>The problem with intelligence information, is that it is a &quot;leaky bucket&quot;, in that it ages quickly.

Like people do.  People with an agenda.  And with old intelligence.

Problem with people getting old, is: the agenda remains, but the intelligence-gathering activity whithers.

Let&#039;s suppose you&#039;re right.  Then NO PROBLEM.  That&#039;s where BUSH and his ADMINISTRATION were BEFORE 9/11.

But if we buy your &quot;take&quot; on the global situation, then we better hope that Obama is rapidly BEEFING UP the US INTELLIGENCE operation globally.

That would help the US sort fiction from fact, worry from danger:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/19/opinion/main5026448.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with intelligence information, is that it is a &#8220;leaky bucket&#8221;, in that it ages quickly.</p>
<p>Like people do.  People with an agenda.  And with old intelligence.</p>
<p>Problem with people getting old, is: the agenda remains, but the intelligence-gathering activity whithers.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s suppose you&#8217;re right.  Then NO PROBLEM.  That&#8217;s where BUSH and his ADMINISTRATION were BEFORE 9/11.</p>
<p>But if we buy your &#8220;take&#8221; on the global situation, then we better hope that Obama is rapidly BEEFING UP the US INTELLIGENCE operation globally.</p>
<p>That would help the US sort fiction from fact, worry from danger:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/19/opinion/main5026448.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/19/opinion/main5026448.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Rurik</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6613</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Rurik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 10:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6613</guid>
		<description>AIPAC: Arrogant Israelites Pulling America&#039;s Chain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIPAC: Arrogant Israelites Pulling America&#8217;s Chain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattSwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6611</link>
		<dc:creator>MattSwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 04:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6611</guid>
		<description>Kirt,

Some people think that the neocons were prevented from giving the go-ahead to an Israeli strike on Iran by virtue of Bush&#039;s refusal to support it.

It is possible that all the &quot;elites&quot; got together and decided not to have a war. It is also possible that GWB got one thing right and (belatedly) stood up to the hawks in his own administration.

http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/02/05/bushs-good-deed/

I don&#039;t know which story to believe, but I am happy that there are two out there, and I&#039;d like to think that Bush finally got one right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirt,</p>
<p>Some people think that the neocons were prevented from giving the go-ahead to an Israeli strike on Iran by virtue of Bush&#8217;s refusal to support it.</p>
<p>It is possible that all the &#8220;elites&#8221; got together and decided not to have a war. It is also possible that GWB got one thing right and (belatedly) stood up to the hawks in his own administration.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/02/05/bushs-good-deed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/02/05/bushs-good-deed/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know which story to believe, but I am happy that there are two out there, and I&#8217;d like to think that Bush finally got one right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirtyHarriet</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6604</link>
		<dc:creator>DirtyHarriet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6604</guid>
		<description>Great article, Mr. PJB.


&quot;... And so we were stampeded into war against a nation that did not threaten or attack us, to strip it of weapons it did not even have.&quot;

The parties responsible for so doing should be held accountable. To date, amazingly, none have. 

We owe it every single soldier maimed in Iraq - and the families of those killed therein - to hold accountable those who led us to believe that Saddam&#039;s Iraq was linked to 9-11, and was a grave and immediate threat to America. 

Justice must be served. Lest we forget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Mr. PJB.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; And so we were stampeded into war against a nation that did not threaten or attack us, to strip it of weapons it did not even have.&#8221;</p>
<p>The parties responsible for so doing should be held accountable. To date, amazingly, none have. </p>
<p>We owe it every single soldier maimed in Iraq &#8211; and the families of those killed therein &#8211; to hold accountable those who led us to believe that Saddam&#8217;s Iraq was linked to 9-11, and was a grave and immediate threat to America. </p>
<p>Justice must be served. Lest we forget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirt Higdon</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6596</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirt Higdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6596</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m too optimistic, but I think the option of war against Iran has been taken off the table and Bibi firmly told that in private.  Bush and the neo-cons were prevented from attacking Iran by the inner establishment, the military/industrial/security complex which runs the US and wants global empire, but not at the price of nuclear war in the Middle East, perhaps including war with Russia.  Obama may not be able to force Bibi&#039;s hand with the Palestinians, but neither he nor the establishment want to have to deal with the results of an Israeli attack on Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m too optimistic, but I think the option of war against Iran has been taken off the table and Bibi firmly told that in private.  Bush and the neo-cons were prevented from attacking Iran by the inner establishment, the military/industrial/security complex which runs the US and wants global empire, but not at the price of nuclear war in the Middle East, perhaps including war with Russia.  Obama may not be able to force Bibi&#8217;s hand with the Palestinians, but neither he nor the establishment want to have to deal with the results of an Israeli attack on Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>Can one make a case for AIPAC to register as a Foreign Agent? Is anyone working toward this goal? This seems to me the best path to take at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can one make a case for AIPAC to register as a Foreign Agent? Is anyone working toward this goal? This seems to me the best path to take at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2009/05/21/bibi-wins-barack-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-6591</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-6591</guid>
		<description>Your right again Pat. However, I think Obama&#039;s smarter than that. With the press conference with Bibi, he said straight out, two state settlement and stopping the building on the west bank. I think he&#039;s trying to appease the right wingers right now, I&#039;m more worried about congress not backing him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right again Pat. However, I think Obama&#8217;s smarter than that. With the press conference with Bibi, he said straight out, two state settlement and stopping the building on the west bank. I think he&#8217;s trying to appease the right wingers right now, I&#8217;m more worried about congress not backing him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

