Why is this Guy Still on the Air?


Somebody get the cane — there, at his straining white neck supporting that big moon-swooning-over-himself head — and get Chris Matthews off the stage.

chris

He is already running for US Senate, using his nightly two-hours of Hardball – not to mention his half-hour Sunday “round table” on NBC — as vehicles for what ought to be the biggest campaign train wreck in the history of Pennsylvania. Sure he’s coy — he’s not officially raising money or announcing formally that he’s exploring a run against 78-year-old Republican Sen. Arlen Specter (at that point, one would hope Matthews and his Human Ego Project would be off-mic for good, per some federal campaign finance law and on pure principle. Some journalists do have some of those left, and those that do should be completely outraged at the way he continues to operate). But the word is out, and contrary to conventional wisdom, all viewers ain’t stupid. Matthews doesn’t want to wreck a good thing, at least for now. He gets free air time to kiss up to political patrons like PA Gov. Ed Rendell and popular Philly radio jocks like Michael Smerconish, while his corporate masters at General Electric can at least hope for MSNBC’s ratings to pull out of the can.

That’s right — MSNBC is still the lowest rated out of the “big three” cable news networks, which still have a very small piece of the overall TV market, so this Matthews flap shouldn’t matter at all in the broader scheme of things. And Matthews is really only a “journalist” by courtesy — being that he and the network have baked up this fantasy that a former political operative and speechwriter who now barks inane questions at bemused guests (many who are as cloyingly desperate as he for the Washington on-air fix) while getting off on his own perceived intellectual vigor, is actually a working journalist.

But I just hate it when the corporate media behemoths get to have it both ways — NBC clinging to its misty water-colored news creds by lionizing its beefier personalities like the late Tim Russert, and wheeling out warmed-over bloviators like Tom Brokaw, and then indulging a guy who is very obviously abusing the privilege, not to mention shamelessly hawking cheesy airport books, sucking up to corrupt Wall Street profiteers and playing off NBC programming like god-awful Saturday Night Live clips as though they delivered breaking news tantamount to earthquakes and war.

Tonight, Matthews broke all records for greasiness when he tried to outdo Sarah Palin, railing against all those — in his sentiments — angry, shiftless Iraqis mobilized around the journalist who threw his shoes at President Bush yesterday. (Americans think it’s funny, he said, that these Iraqi men seem to have so much time on their hands to protest, ha, ha. Please, Matthews, don’t speak for me). How dare this man throw shoes, he said, or protesters burn the stars and stripes when the U.S sacrificed 4,000 men and women so people like that journalist could have the freedom to attend a perfectly reasonable, finely orchestrated event in which the President of the United States could whitewash the bloody scar that is his Iraq outside?

Matthews’ guests tonight, who included Rajiv Chandrasekaren, author of Imperial Life in the Emerald City, (who knows a thing or two about court jesters and sycophants) seemed mildly flummoxed — wasn’t this the same guy who had them on a while back to rail against neocons and Dick Cheney and misguided preemptive war? Nevermind, Matthews has rural constituents he has to patronize now — you know, those voters “who cling to their guns and their religion” and who couldn’t possibly know anything about why some poor Iraqi who had been kidnapped by his own people and detained by U.S forces and lives in a country with 30 percent unemployment might want to insult George W. Bush.

Just turn it off, you might say. Fair enough. Leave it to karma — you bet. But all this week we have had to stomach a parade of Bush Administration officials trying to sell this dung that the Iraqi people are better off now than they were under Saddam Hussein. Meanwhile, there are stories like these (the irony in the MSNBC-WaPo co-branding not lost here) that cling like storm detritus and break your heart, and we find out only today that the American taxpayer has poured billions of dollars into a feel-good reconstruction plan that never happened. Chris Matthews, who could never muster enough of his self-proclaimed skills at “hardball” to talk about the hired “message force multiplers” who sold this war on the Pentagon’s behalf (mostly because it’s hard to do that and be supplicant at the same time) is now doing the same thing, covertly trying to sell himself to the people of Pennsylvania. If that’s not grounds for a kick in the can, or even a small cry of protest from the Rapidly Shrinking Base of Principled Persons Who Still Watch TV News, I don’t know what does.

Share      Filed under: media, Politics

18 Responses to “Why is this Guy Still on the Air?”

  1. Just FYI your MSNBC link is dead.

  2. Fixed — thanks for the heads up!

  3. “Stars and bars”–surely that must’ve been deliberate?

    BTW, otherwise a thorough evisceration of the pseudo-intellectuals at NBC (although one has to note that Olbermann was essentially alone in attacking Bush on war policy in the major media–okay, admittedly, only the 300,000 people who watch MSNBC saw it, but still.)

  4. As this isn’t Chronicles, my stars and bars comment might be too obscure. “Stars and bars” refers to the 1st National flag of the CSA, not the “Stars and Stripes.” http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us-csa1.html

    A thoroughly enjoyable post nonetheless.

  5. you are right! that was careless — considering i had heard the same reference (in the correct context) in a conversation last week!

  6. Here’s an interesting question: if Matthews runs, who will hold the obsequious interview with him?

  7. P.S. How old is the file photo you used? Matthew is much fatter than that now.

  8. someone ought to rerun all that old crap. Mathews was the biggest Iraq War cheerleader of all. No one pushed the “I’d rather have a beer with Bush than Gore” meme harder that Mathews, and I do mean harder. You could almost see the boner

  9. Matthews was a big cheerleader for the war in Iraq and later criticized it. He is an idiot like most media talking skulls.

  10. Matthews is a jerk. I used to watch his show, but can’t any longer. He can’t get enough of himself when Hammond from SNL does a sketch playing him. But he is either really stupid, or just in the tank for the establishment. I think it’s both. To have the same people on, over and over, and ask them the same simplistic and irrelevant questions, over and over, is the definition of insanity. Matthews doesn’t seem to understand that only the congress can declare war, that one branch of the federal government can’t delegate its enumerated powers to another branch, and everything done by the US to harm the people of Iraq is a war crime, as defined by the good old USA at the Nuremberg Trials.

  11. I remember the day that Sadam’s statue was toppled in Bagdad. Matthews said ” We’re all neo-coms now”. I shouted back to the TV, “Not all of us!”
    He now acts like he was always opposed to the war.
    If he would just let his guest answer before interupting them.

  12. If Bill O’liely is still on, why can’t Matthews? Why is Rove on, and not in jail? How about Oliver North? Not to mention Savage, Limbaugh, etc. Big whoop…

  13. I’ll never forget in 2000 when Matthews was jumping up and down with glee and yelling over and over again “Gore Concede You Lost!” That was the first time I realized what a greedy pig he was. I’ve avoided his program ever since.

  14. If Matthews runs, then he will be adoringly interviewed by that most punishing of interviewers, Larry King.

  15. He will truly be the Senator “Most likely to interrupt”. Here is my response to his candidacy:

    http://www.ihasaids.com/upload/data/1229313488.gif

  16. [...] 7.  “Why is this Guy Still on the Air? [...]

  17. “Here’s an interesting question: if Matthews runs, who will hold the obsequious interview with him?”

    Why, he’ll interview himself, of course!

    “P.S. How old is the file photo you used? Matthew is much fatter than that now.”

    You meant to say “much fatter head, now,” right?

  18. It is quite true that Chris Matthews is an irritating blow-hard, but he made up for all his previous sins of omission and commission and world-class boorishness with his scathing criticism of Frank Gaffney Gaffney, or Thersites redux, is a shameless liar and supporter of Bush’s insane war for eight years, and a pathetic lick-spittle supporter of the religious zealots of the Likud Party. These fanatics are well along toward creating their own Mossada. But religious fanatics of all stripes, from Jim Jones and his cool-aide drinkers to crazies who believe they are god’s chosen people, eventually bring the pillars down on their own heads as well as the heads of their women and children.
    Frank Gaffney has blood on his hands while Matthews only has dung on his.

Leave a Reply