<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hamiltonianism With Chinese Characteristics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2008/11/11/hamiltonianism-with-chinese-characteristics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2008/11/11/hamiltonianism-with-chinese-characteristics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hamiltonianism-with-chinese-characteristics</link>
	<description>@TAC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:27:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2008/11/11/hamiltonianism-with-chinese-characteristics/comment-page-1/#comment-2198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1247#comment-2198</guid>
		<description>I always enjoy Pat Buchanan.  He&#039;s seen it all, and his prognoses seem to be consistently correct.  I do find myself pretty depressed after reading a lot of his articles, because I&#039;m not sure that they prescribe many remedies.  Is he the prophet calling us to repentance, or is he the oracle warning us to steel ourselves to meet our fate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always enjoy Pat Buchanan.  He&#8217;s seen it all, and his prognoses seem to be consistently correct.  I do find myself pretty depressed after reading a lot of his articles, because I&#8217;m not sure that they prescribe many remedies.  Is he the prophet calling us to repentance, or is he the oracle warning us to steel ourselves to meet our fate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Panfile</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2008/11/11/hamiltonianism-with-chinese-characteristics/comment-page-1/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Panfile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1247#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>Presuming what is stated here is true, one thing it shows, which is a serious problem I would presume for all &#039;conservatives,&#039; is an extremely successful centrally managed economy.  In other words, it may be possible that what was wrong with Hitler on the one hand and the Soviet system on the other was not a problem in theory, but one of competence.

Aside from the relatively passive device of imposing high tariffs on imports, what could the American government do about this issue while still pretending all the mythologies about the free market and government being bad at everything are also true?  Is the assumption that tax and tariff policies alone would make American corporations serve the national interest as well as those in China clearly have true, or is more needed?  If more is needed, is not the notion that conservative orthodoxy is obsolete more or less proven?  Are we to presume that just by adjusting tariffs and tax structures, our &#039;free and unfettered&#039; corporate system will outcompete the Chinese system operating in close concert with government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presuming what is stated here is true, one thing it shows, which is a serious problem I would presume for all &#8216;conservatives,&#8217; is an extremely successful centrally managed economy.  In other words, it may be possible that what was wrong with Hitler on the one hand and the Soviet system on the other was not a problem in theory, but one of competence.</p>
<p>Aside from the relatively passive device of imposing high tariffs on imports, what could the American government do about this issue while still pretending all the mythologies about the free market and government being bad at everything are also true?  Is the assumption that tax and tariff policies alone would make American corporations serve the national interest as well as those in China clearly have true, or is more needed?  If more is needed, is not the notion that conservative orthodoxy is obsolete more or less proven?  Are we to presume that just by adjusting tariffs and tax structures, our &#8216;free and unfettered&#8217; corporate system will outcompete the Chinese system operating in close concert with government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/2008/11/11/hamiltonianism-with-chinese-characteristics/comment-page-1/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=1247#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>Are there any solutions, or are there only problems?
http://rightklik.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any solutions, or are there only problems?<br />
<a href="http://rightklik.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rightklik.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

